How to Solve Problems Easier: The No-Nonsense Approach That Actually Works

Connect with us: SB Nation | Medium | Pexels | Elephant Journal | Quora

Three months ago, I watched a perfectly competent project manager spend forty-seven minutes trying to figure out why the office printer wasn't working. Forty-seven minutes. Of troubleshooting. Googling. Calling IT. Making frustrated noises.

The power cable was unplugged.

This is the state of problem-solving in Australian workplaces today, and frankly, it's doing my head in. After seventeen years of training professionals across Melbourne, Sydney, and Brisbane, I've seen the same patterns repeat themselves like a broken record. Smart people making simple problems complicated because nobody taught them the fundamentals.

The Real Problem With Problem-Solving

Here's what drives me mental: we've overcomplicated everything. Walk into any corporate training room and you'll find elaborate flowcharts, decision trees that look like family genealogies, and enough buzzwords to choke a horse. Six Sigma this, Lean methodology that, root cause analysis until you're blue in the face.

But here's the thing – and this might ruffle some feathers – most workplace problems don't need a PhD in process improvement to solve. They need common sense, a systematic approach, and the courage to actually implement solutions instead of talking them to death.

I was guilty of this myself back in 2019. Spent three weeks developing a comprehensive problem-solving framework for a manufacturing client, complete with stakeholder mapping and impact assessments. Colour-coded spreadsheets. The works. You know what actually solved their productivity issue? Moving the tool storage closer to the workstations. Took fifteen minutes and cost nothing.

Sometimes the best solution is the obvious one staring you in the face.

The Four-Step Reality Check Method

Forget everything you've been taught about problem-solving frameworks. Here's what actually works in the real world:

Step 1: Stop and Actually Define the Problem

Most people skip this step entirely. They jump straight into solution mode without understanding what they're actually trying to fix. It's like trying to give someone directions when you don't know where they're starting from.

I see this constantly in customer service scenarios. Staff member says "the customer is angry." But that's not the problem – that's a symptom. The problem might be a faulty product, a billing error, unclear communication, or unrealistic expectations. Different problems, completely different solutions.

Step 2: Ask "What Would Happen If We Did Nothing?"

This separates real problems from imaginary ones. Sometimes the best solution is no solution at all. Not every issue requires immediate action. Some problems solve themselves. Others aren't actually problems – they're just inconveniences we've elevated to crisis status because someone higher up the food chain mentioned them in passing.

Step 3: Generate Solutions Without Immediately Shooting Them Down

Here's where most Australian workplaces fail spectacularly. Someone suggests an idea, and within thirty seconds, five people have explained why it won't work. We're brilliant at finding problems with solutions. Absolutely useless at generating them.

Try this instead: spend ten minutes writing down every possible solution, no matter how ridiculous. Include the expensive ones, the time-consuming ones, even the slightly illegal ones (kidding). Then evaluate them separately. You'll be surprised what emerges.

Step 4: Test Small, Scale Smart

Don't bet the farm on untested solutions. Run pilots. Try things for a week. Measure what happens. Effective communication training often starts with small team experiments before rolling out company-wide.

This is where larger organisations like Qantas excel – they test process changes on specific routes or departments before implementing across their entire operation. Smart approach.

Why Most Problem-Solving Training Misses the Mark

The training industry has a dirty little secret: most problem-solving courses are designed by people who've never actually worked in operational roles. They're theoretical frameworks created in boardrooms by consultants who haven't dealt with real workplace problems since the Howard government.

Real problems are messy. They involve personalities, politics, budget constraints, and time pressures. They don't fit neatly into process maps.

I remember facilitating a session for a retail chain where we spent two hours analysing their staff retention problem using various diagnostic tools. Finally, someone mentioned that their main competitor down the road was paying $3 more per hour. Problem identified. Solution obvious. Framework irrelevant.

The Australian Context Makes Everything Different

Here's something those imported American business books won't tell you: Australian workplace culture affects how problems get solved. We're direct but diplomatic. We value practical solutions over theoretical perfection. We'll give things a fair go, but we won't tolerate time-wasting processes.

This means successful problem-solving in Australian workplaces needs to account for our cultural preferences:

• Solutions need to be explained simply, without corporate jargon
• Implementation plans should be flexible, not rigid
• Team input is expected, not optional
• Results matter more than process adherence

Perth mining companies understand this better than most. When equipment breaks down, they don't form committees to analyse the situation. They fix it, document what worked, and move on. Simple.

Common Mistakes That Drive Me Mental

Mistaking Symptoms for Problems: Your staff aren't "unmotivated" – they're probably unclear about expectations, under-resourced, or dealing with systemic issues you haven't addressed.

Analysis Paralysis: Some people would rather study a problem for six months than spend two hours implementing an imperfect solution. Perfect is the enemy of good, especially in fast-moving industries.

Committee Syndrome: Not every problem needs input from seventeen stakeholders. Sometimes one person with decision-making authority can solve things in minutes.

Technology Tunnel Vision: Assuming every problem needs a digital solution. Sometimes the answer is better training, clearer communication, or simply removing obstacles.

What Works in Practice

The best problem-solvers I've worked with share common characteristics. They ask good questions. They listen more than they talk. They're comfortable with uncertainty. They focus on outcomes, not processes.

They also understand that solving problems is often about managing relationships, not just fixing technical issues. The accounts payable dispute might be about invoice processing, but it's really about trust between departments.

Professional development training that acknowledges this human element consistently outperforms purely technical approaches.

The Implementation Reality

Here's what nobody talks about: even perfect solutions fail if they're not implemented properly. Implementation is where good ideas go to die.

Successful implementation requires three things:

• Clear communication about what's changing and why
• Adequate resources and support
• Follow-up to ensure changes stick

Most organisations nail the first point, struggle with the second, and completely ignore the third. Then they wonder why their problem-solving initiatives don't create lasting change.

I've seen brilliant solutions abandoned after two weeks because nobody checked whether they were actually working or if staff needed additional support.

Beyond the Obvious

Sometimes the real problem isn't the obvious one. Staff turnover might not be about pay – it could be poor management, lack of career development, or workplace culture issues. Customer complaints might not be about product quality – they could be about unclear expectations or inadequate support.

The key is asking "What else could this be?" before jumping to conclusions.

This approach has served me well across industries, from manufacturing plants in Geelong to tech startups in Sydney. Problems are problems, regardless of context, but solutions need to fit the environment where they'll be implemented.

The Bottom Line

Problem-solving isn't rocket science, but it requires discipline, curiosity, and the courage to try things that might not work. Most workplace problems are solvable with existing resources and knowledge – we just need to apply them systematically.

Stop overthinking it. Start with the basics. Define the real problem, generate options, test solutions, and measure results. Everything else is commentary.

The printer cable is probably just unplugged. Check that first.